Understanding Community: A Socio-Political Perspective for Social Work Professionals | Social Work |

Faculty Adda Team

Introduction

Communities shape identities, influence social behavior, and play a crucial role in social work practice. But what exactly defines a "community"? Is it just a geographical space, or does it extend to shared beliefs, interests, and digital interactions?

(toc) #title=(Table of content)

This blog explores socio-political understandings of community, drawing from academic insights to help educators, researchers, and social work professionals grasp its evolving nature.


Key Learning Objectives

By the end of this post, you will:
✔ Gain a sociological understanding of community.
✔ Engage in conceptual debates on community dynamics.
✔ Learn about community typologies (geographic vs. interest-based).
✔ Understand the community vs. neighborhood vs. network debate.


1. What is a Community? A Sociological Perspective

Communities are more than just groups of people living together—they represent shared identity, mutual support, and belonging.

Key Definitions:

  • MacIver (Traditional View): A community requires locality (geographical area) + community sentiment (shared identity).

  • Toennies (Gemeinschaft vs. Gesellschaft):

    • Gemeinschaft: Organic bonds (family, village).

    • Gesellschaft: Contractual relations (urban, professional ties).

  • Modern View: Communities now include digital spaces (virtual communities), professional networks, and interest-based groups.

Community Critique (Bauman, 2001):

  • Pros: Provides security, belonging, and mutual aid.

  • Cons: Can restrict freedom (e.g., oppressive patriarchal communities like Khap Panchayats).


2. Typologies of Community: How Are They Structured?

Communities can be classified based on:

A. Geographic vs. Choice-Based Communities

TypeExample
GeographicVillage communities, urban neighborhoods
Choice-BasedReligious groups, online forums, professional networks

B. Activity-Based vs. Belief-Based Communities

  • Activity-Based: Sports teams, hobby groups.

  • Belief-Based: Religious or ideological communities.

C. Frequency of Interaction

  • High Interaction: Close-knit neighborhoods.

  • Low Interaction: Global online communities.


3. Community vs. Neighborhood vs. Network

ConceptDefinitionExample
CommunityShared identity, mutual concernA tribal group, online support forum
NeighborhoodGeographically bounded areaA residential colony
NetworkSocial connections beyond geographyLinkedIn professional groups

Three Perspectives on Community (Network Theory):

  1. Community Lost: Urbanization weakens local ties. (Traditional villages fading)

  2. Community Saved: Neighborhoods still foster solidarity. (Resident welfare associations)

  3. Community Liberated: Communities exist beyond geography. (Facebook groups, global activism networks)


4. Why Does This Matter for Social Work Professionals?

  • Community organizing requires understanding power dynamics (e.g., privileged vs. marginalized groups).

  • Digital communities are reshaping social work outreach.

  • Policy interventions must consider both geographic and non-geographic communities.


Key Takeaways

🔹 Communities are evolving—from physical spaces to digital networks.
🔹 Not all communities are equal—some empower, while others oppress.
🔹 Social workers must adapt to new forms of community engagement.


Engage With Us!

💬 What’s your take on virtual communities vs. traditional ones? Share in the comments!

📌 Follow Faculty Adda for more insights on social sciences and education! 


#buttons=(Accept !) #days=(20)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. Learn More
Accept !
To Top